Your Personal Wellness Report

A personalised wellness assessment that adapts to your answers and generates your evidence-based report.

Your progress is saved automatically as you complete the assessment.

68 Questions
8 Sections
15 min Assessment
The depth behind your Report
690Foods analysed
10Body systems reviewed
125Nutritional pathways modelled
177Bioactive mechanisms mapped
29Vitamins & minerals scored
30,000+ Food pathways traced

Every score in your Report is calculated right here, by our own nutritional pathway engine — there’s no AI involved. Your answers are used only to make your report; they are never sold or used for advertising, and are shared only with the business that runs this assessment and, if you came through one, your Wellness Advisor.

How your PWR Score works

This page explains, in plain English, how your PWR Score and food plan are worked out, where the information comes from, what has been checked and what has not. A short technical appendix at the end is for dietitians, clinics and anyone who wants the detail.

The short version

You answer 68 questions about how you feel and what matters to you. Your answers show which of 10 body systems you most want to support. For each of those, we look at the biological pathways that food can influence, and then at which foods have published links to those pathways through the compounds, vitamins and minerals they contain.

Your PWR Score, from 0 to 1000, shows how well a plan of ten foods, chosen to work together, covers your priorities. It is a way of organising published nutrition knowledge around what you told us. It is not a measurement of your health.

What it is not

  • Not a diagnosis. It cannot tell you whether you have, or are likely to have, any health condition.
  • Not treatment or medical advice. The food ideas are general wellbeing suggestions. They do not replace advice from your GP, a registered dietitian or a registered nutritionist.
  • Not a promise of results. A higher score means the foods match your stated priorities more closely. It does not guarantee a change in how you feel.
  • Not a judgement of you. The score is about a list of foods, never about a person.
  • Not complete. The questions ask whether you regularly take prescribed medicines and, if relevant, whether you are pregnant, trying to conceive or breastfeeding. If you say yes, your report reminds you to check the plan with a professional first. The food plan itself does not change for either answer, and we do not ask which medicines you take. If you take medicines, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a diagnosed condition, please check with a healthcare professional before changing what you eat.

Built-in safety checks

Before the questions, the quiz can show a short check-in about how you feel about eating. It is based on the SCOFF questions (Morgan, Reid and Lacey, BMJ 1999), a short screening tool widely used by GPs and eating-disorder services in the UK. If your answers suggest that a food-focused report may not be right for you at the moment, the quiz stops, no report is made, and the page points you to support. The check-in answers are not saved. The site owner can switch it off, and it is on by default.

Separately, some answers add a note to your report suggesting you mention something to your GP, for example feeling breathless very often during everyday activities.

How it works, step by step

  1. You answer the questions

    There are 68 questions in 8 sections. Each answer is linked to one or more of 10 body systems: Digestive System; Intestinal System; Circulatory System; Brain & Nervous System; Immune System; Respiratory System; Urinary System; Glandular System; Structural System; and Skin, Hair & Nails. Your answers are turned into a priority for each body system, from 0 to 100. If you pick wellness goals (up to three), the body systems that relate to those goals get a small lift. A body system that only a few questions speak to is treated cautiously, so one answer alone cannot make it your top priority.

  2. Priorities become pathways

    Each body system is linked to the biological pathways that matter for it, such as oxidative stress or blood vessel function. There are 125 pathways. The higher a body system's priority, the more weight its pathways carry.

  3. Foods are linked to pathways

    The catalogue holds 690 foods. Each food is linked to the pathways it can influence, mostly through the 177 food compounds it contains (for example beta-glucan fibre in oats) and through its vitamins and minerals (29 are mapped). Every link has a strength from 1 (minimal) to 5 (very strong) and a confidence level showing how well established it is. Where a food reaches a pathway through a chain (food, then compound, then pathway), the chain counts only as strongly as its weakest link.

  4. Each food is scored for you

    A food's score for you adds up the pathways that matter to you, each multiplied by the strength and confidence of the food's link to it. A food's best matches count the most and each further match counts a little less, so a food that is very good at a few relevant things can beat one that is only fair at many. The result is put on a scale of 0 to 1000.

  5. Allergies and diets are respected

    If you tell us about an allergy, or choose a way of eating such as vegetarian, foods that do not fit are left out completely. They are not just ranked lower.

  6. Your plan and your PWR Score

    We choose ten foods to work together. The first is the food that covers the most on its own. Each one after that is the food that adds the most on top of those already chosen. A second food doing the same job as one already in the plan adds nothing, which is why ten foods doing ten different jobs score higher than ten that repeat each other. Your PWR Score shows how fully the ten cover your priorities, giving more weight to the priorities that matter most to you. A PWR Boost shows what one more food would change.

Because the score is measured against your own priorities, two people with different answers can have the same score for very different reasons. Use it to compare your own plans over time, not to compare yourself with other people.

Where the information comes from

Pathways and their evidence

Every pathway carries an evidence rating: 38 are rated High, 84 Moderate and 3 Low. The rating is our own editorial judgement of how strong the published evidence is. It is not a formal systematic review.

Each pathway also names the kind of authority whose published guidance fits its topic best. The bodies named include NHS, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, EFSA, British Heart Foundation and British Dietetic Association. This shows where to look for general guidance on that subject. It does not mean that any of these organisations has reviewed or endorsed YourPWR. Every pathway also lists at least one specific published paper or article, which you can browse on this site's Evidence Library page where it is shown.

Links between foods, compounds and pathways

These links were compiled by YourPWR from published nutrition and food-science literature and are stored with a strength and a confidence level. They are a summary of existing research, not the result of a new study. Research behind them is often about single compounds, laboratory work or particular groups of people, so a strength rating describes the research in general and cannot promise the same effect for every person.

Nutrition figures

Typical values per 100g come from McCance and Widdowson's Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset (CoFID) 2021, published by the UK Government under the Open Government Licence v3.0, and from USDA FoodData Central (public domain). 625 of the 690 foods have figures, and each records which source entry it came from. Real foods vary with variety, season and cooking, so these are typical values, not exact ones.

What has been checked

  • The knowledge files have written structures (schemas), and a validator checks them for required fields and correct types.
  • Every nutrition figure was matched to a named entry in its source. Figures that looked wrong, for example calories that did not agree with the protein, fat and carbohydrate shown, were flagged and corrected.
  • Automatic tests run on each release over the question flow, the scoring, the report, the privacy features and the eating check-in.
  • The score bands were set by running made-up test profiles (not real people) through the engine and looking at the spread of results.
  • Reports show the evidence rating and source next to each pathway, so anyone can see what a recommendation rests on.

What is still to be checked

Here is where things stand today, so you know what this page can and cannot tell you.

  • No clinical trial or outcome study has yet tested whether following a YourPWR plan changes health or how people feel.
  • A registered nutritionist or dietitian has not yet reviewed the wording and the method. Until that review is done, please read this page as a plain description of how the tool works, not as a professional endorsement of it.
  • The strength and confidence ratings are our own summary of published research. They have not been independently audited.
  • Everything depends on your own answers. No tests, blood results or medical records are used.
  • The foods have not been checked against medicine interactions, and the plan does not adjust for medicines or pregnancy. These answers only add a reminder to your report.

We will update this page as each of these is completed.

Technical appendix

For dietitians, clinics and anyone who wants the detail. Plugin version 2.21.1; PWR scale version 2.

1. Body-system priorities

  • Each answer has a value (for example 0, 0.33, 0.67, 1 for a four-step frequency question). Each question has weights linking it to body systems. Raw points for a body system are the sum of answer value times weight.
  • Raw points are divided by the most that body system could score, giving a value from 0 to 100.
  • Shrinkage: with n answered questions feeding a body system, trust = n / (n + 6). The final value is trust times the raw value, plus (1 minus trust) times the person's average across body systems. A system backed by few questions therefore leans towards the person's own average.
  • Goals: up to three chosen goals add 15 points to a goal's primary body systems and 7 points to its secondary ones. Where several goals apply to a body system, the largest single bonus is used and they are not added together.

2. Pathway weights

  • A pathway's score is the body system's priority times the pathway's weight within that system (as a percentage). A pathway linked to more than one body system takes the highest of those values rather than the sum.

3. Food-to-pathway links

  • Food to compound and compound to pathway links each carry a strength (1 to 5) and a confidence label (High 0.95, Moderate 0.87, Emerging 0.75).
  • For a chain, strength is the lower of the two strengths and confidence is the product of the two confidences, rounded to two places. Where several chains reach the same pathway, the best by strength, then confidence, is used.
  • Vitamin and mineral links join the same list through a separate route (food to nutrient, nutrient to pathway).

4. Scoring one food

  • Contribution of a matched pathway = pathway score x (strength / 5) x confidence. Contributions under 0.5 are ignored.
  • Contributions are ranked from largest to smallest and combined with a decay of 0.6 per rank: the total is the sum of contribution x 0.6 to the power of its rank, starting at rank 0.
  • Raw food score = 0.8 x that total + 0.2 x that total x the average of (strength / 5 x confidence) over the matched pathways.
  • Food points = raw food score / 192.33 x 1000, capped at 1000. The ceiling is the raw score of the best food when every body system is at priority 100, so it is the highest value the engine can produce for the current catalogue.
  • A food that matches an allergy or dietary tag is excluded before scoring.

5. The plan and the PWR Score

  • For each body system, coverage is the weighted share of that system's pathways reached by the plan, each counted at the strength of the best food in the plan that reaches it (strength 1 to 5).
  • PWR Score = the priority-weighted mean coverage across body systems x 1000.
  • Plan selection is greedy: the first food is the one with the highest plan score alone, and each next food is the one that raises the plan score most. Choices are drawn from the person's best 300 foods by individual score.
  • A PWR Boost is the plan score recalculated with one more food. Up to 3 boosts are shown, and a boost smaller than 5 points is not shown. Foods in the Algae & Superfoods group and the Sea Vegetables group are never offered as boosts, and a few specialist foods are also left out.

6. Bands

Bands are labels for orientation, set from the spread of results on test profiles. They are not clinical categories.

Plan score bands (the PWR Score)
BandPoints
Outstanding850 and above
Excellent780 to 849
Strong650 to 779
Good450 to 649
Supportive0 to 449
Food point bands (one food on its own)
BandPoints
Outstanding600 and above
Excellent450 to 599
Strong340 to 449
Good250 to 339
Supportive0 to 249

7. Versions

  • The 0 to 1000 scale depends on the food catalogue. When foods or links are added, the ceiling is re-derived and the scale version is increased. Each report records the scale version it was scored with, so older numbers stay understood.
  • Nutrition facts file: version 20261023-2.0.

This assessment is for educational and general wellness purposes only. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace professional medical advice. If any of your answers raise a personal health concern, please speak to your GP or a qualified healthcare professional.

Retaking the assessment? Enter your saved code